Hinds Today

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) clarified her stance on in vitro fertilization (IVF) and S.3612 in a recent statement. Hyde-Smith addressed misconceptions and her objections to the legislation in question.

In her statement, Senator Hyde-Smith expressed frustration with the portrayal of her views in the media, stating, "The media headlines and stories painting the picture that I object to IVF are blatantly misleading and some are boldfaced lies." She emphasized her support for IVF, saying, "I have been clear about my strong support of IVF and its ability to help bring God’s beautiful creations into the world."

Regarding S.3612 and its association with IVF protection, Hyde-Smith clarified, "Senator Duckworth’s legislation was construed as ‘protecting IVF,’ when in reality, no states have banned or intend to ban IVF." She explained her objection to the unanimous consent request for S.3612, citing concerns about its potential impact on life and religious freedoms, stating, "I objected to the unanimous consent request to pass S.3612 due to its broad, sweeping language that would have serious consequences in our goal to protect life and religious freedoms."

As Chair of the Pro-Life Caucus, Senator Hyde-Smith reiterated her commitment to protecting the lives of mothers and children, underscoring her belief that the bill was too opaque to bypass Senate procedure. Hyde-Smith's full floor remarks regarding her objection to the unanimous consent request can be accessed for further context.

The statement aims to provide clarity on Senator Hyde-Smith's position on IVF and S.3612, emphasizing her support for IVF while expressing reservations about the specific language and implications of the legislation in question.